Compare
Devin Desktop vs Kimi Code
A plain-English comparison to help you choose between them.
A local agentic IDE against an open-source CLI challenger. Pick Devin Desktop when you want the agent living in your editor: its local agent tracks what you are doing and carries multi-step, multi-file changes with little prompting, with unlimited tab autocomplete and quota pricing that refreshes predictably. Pick Kimi Code when you want an agent added to the tools you already run: an open-source CLI that speaks ACP for editors such as Zed and JetBrains, reuses existing MCP servers, and can back Claude Code through an Anthropic-compatible endpoint, on flat pricing rather than metered agent work.
Both tools chosen. Compare is enabled.
Side by side
- Summary
Devin Desktop, formerly Windsurf, is the local IDE of Cognition's Devin family: an agentic editor whose local agent executes multi-step coding tasks, with unlimited tab autocompletion and quota-based pricing that refreshes predictably rather than metering anxiety.
The family position matters: the same company's autonomous Devin handles delegation in the cloud, while this is the hands-on editor for daily work, after a mid-2026 rebrand that folded the Windsurf identity into Devin.
MoreLess
For teams allergic to ecosystem churn, that recent history is itself a datum; for everyone else, it is a capable agentic IDE with unusually predictable economics.
- Best for
- Agentic editing with a local multi-step agent
- Unlimited tab autocomplete without metering
- Predictable quota-refresh pricing
- Daily hands-on work in the Devin family
- Developers pairing an IDE with an autonomous sibling
- Cost
- Freemium (Free tier + paid plans)
- Ease
- Openness
- Hosted service
- Data
- Standard cloud-assistant posture with enterprise controls on team plans; code context handling is documented for review.
- Summary
Kimi Code is a coding agent for the terminal and IDEs whose command-line interface is itself open source, published by Moonshot AI in the MoonshotAI/kimi-code repository. Its distinguishing move is that you can adopt it without leaving your current tool: the agent speaks the Agent Client Protocol, so ACP-compatible editors such as Zed and JetBrains can drive it, and it can import the MCP servers configured for other agents.
It also runs as a backend for other coding agents, Claude Code among them, through an Anthropic-compatible API endpoint: point the base URL and key at Kimi and the front end stays the same. Under it sits Kimi K2.7-Code, an open-weight, coding-focused model Moonshot released on 12 June 2026 on Hugging Face under a Modified MIT licence, with a 256K-token context window.
MoreLess
Access comes through a Kimi Code plan or wider Kimi membership: a monthly subscription from around $19 at the Moderato tier, or pay-as-you-go through the API. Quotas refresh weekly and carry concurrency limits, so heavy use needs an eye on the meter. A plan also folds in broader Kimi membership benefits.
- Best for
- Open-source terminal and IDE agent adopted without switching tools
- Speaks ACP so Zed and JetBrains can drive it
- Backs Claude Code through an Anthropic-compatible endpoint
- Imports MCP servers configured for other agents
- Subscription from around $19, or pay-as-you-go through the API
- Cost
- Freemium (Free tier + paid plans)
- Ease
- Openness
- Runs privately (self-hostable)
- Data
- The command-line client is open source, but where your code travels depends on the route you take. The coding plan links its legal documents to kimi.com, whose terms place data in the People's Republic of China under a Beijing entity; the separate developer OpenPlatform states servers in Singapore. Establish which route you are on before sending sensitive work through it. Agent output needs the same diff review as any coding agent before it ships.
Pricing
- Devin Desktop
Free·$20·$200·from $80·Custom
Prices as of August 2026.
- Free
- Free
- Pro
- $20per monthusage billed at API rates
- Max
- $200per monthusage billed at API rates
- Teams
- from $80per monthusage billed at API rates
- Enterprise
- Price on applicationno list price published
- Kimi Code
$19·$39·$99·$199
Prices as of August 2026.
- Moderato
- $19per month$15 per month if billed annually; new plans are waitlist-only
- Allegretto
- $39per month$31 per month if billed annually; new plans are waitlist-only
- Allegro
- $99per month$79 per month if billed annually; new plans are waitlist-only
- Vivace
- $199per month$159 per month if billed annually; new plans are waitlist-only
By area
Where each one pulls ahead, area by area.
| Area | Devin Desktop | Kimi Code |
|---|---|---|
| By job | ||
| Software development | Devin Desktop is shaped as a VS Code fork, so the agentic work happens in the editor most developers already know | Kimi Code works across a 256K-token context on large repositories, so the limit is the model's reach rather than the editor's |
| By task | ||
| Coding & software development | Devin Desktop — when you want an agentic editor that anticipates rather than waits for instructions | Kimi Code is a cost lever inside the stack a team already runs rather than a migration to a new client |
Common questions
How different is the daily working style?
Considerably. Devin Desktop is an environment: you code inside it, and its agent anticipates, carrying changes as you work, which suits developers who want assistance ambient rather than dispatched. Kimi Code is a worker you address: from the terminal, from an ACP editor, or behind another client, task by task. Ambient collaboration versus explicit dispatch is the real temperament test between them.
Where does openness matter here?
Kimi Code's CLI is open source and its underlying model ships open-weight on Hugging Face, so inspection and self-hosting the model are real options; its hosted API, though, is served from China, which sensitive codebases must weigh. Devin Desktop is closed and conventional in posture. If openness is philosophy, Kimi delivers it; if it is a compliance requirement, read both vendors' terms.
What about pricing and product stability?
Devin Desktop's freemium quota model refreshes predictably by design, and the caveat is identity rather than economics: the mid-2026 rebrand from Windsurf caps a history of churn that stability-minded buyers should note. Kimi Code's plans carry weekly quota refreshes and concurrency caps, so bursty heavy use meets the meter. Neither is expensive; both reward reading the limits first.
Related comparisons
Read the full guides
Where to start
Not sure what to adopt first?
Five quick questions about your job, task and constraints. We'll suggest your top three tools, plus the one to try first.
Tool facts last checked August 2026