Compare
Vanta vs Secureframe
A plain-English comparison to help you choose between them.
Vanta is the category's Forrester-ranked default: an agentic trust platform across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, HITRUST, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001 and FedRAMP, bought at organisational scale. Secureframe's sharpest edge is the federal lane: Secureframe Defense carries contractors through CMMC certification with AI-generated System Security Plans. Commercial SaaS shortlists Vanta by default; anyone selling into the US government should have Secureframe on the list.
Both tools chosen. Compare is enabled.
Side by side
- Summary
Vanta is a compliance automation platform rebuilt around AI agents. Its Agentic Trust Platform, introduced in November 2025, sets an agent on the recurring grind of governance, risk and compliance: drafting policies, answering security questionnaires, collecting evidence and flagging issues, alongside the continuous control monitoring that made its name.
Frameworks span SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, HITRUST, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001 and FedRAMP, with evidence from hundreds of integrations across cloud, HR and identity systems. Vendor risk, audit preparation and a public trust centre share the platform.
MoreLess
It is bought rather than tried: no published pricing, no free tier, 16,000+ customers, and a Leader in Forrester's GRC Wave for Q2 2026. It suits companies that want compliance run as a system with human sign-off, not a quarterly scramble.
- Best for
- Automating evidence collection for SOC 2, ISO 27001 and related frameworks
- AI-drafted policies and questionnaire answers routed through human review
- Continuous control monitoring across cloud, HR and identity systems
- Startups needing a first certification to pass enterprise procurement
- Vendor risk management and trust-centre publishing in one platform
- Cost
- Enterprise
- Ease
- Openness
- Hosted service
- Data
- Vanta's whole mechanism is persistent read access to a company's most sensitive systems, cloud infrastructure, HR and identity among them. That makes its own data posture part of the purchase decision. Before connecting core systems, review Vanta's data terms and its published trust centre to confirm data-handling, sub-processor and retention arrangements, applying the same scrutiny to Vanta that it helps you apply to your own vendors. The evidence, policies and questionnaire answers it holds are compliance-sensitive by definition, so access to Vanta itself belongs inside the access reviews it runs.
- Summary
Secureframe is an automated security, privacy and compliance platform. It connects to cloud infrastructure, identity and HR systems, collects evidence continuously and monitors controls against SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, CCPA and CMMC 2.0. The Comply AI suite drafts policies, scores risk, maps controls across frameworks and generates infrastructure-as-code fixes for failing controls, while AI Evidence Validation flags missing documents and outdated timestamps before auditors do, and Trust AI answers security questionnaires from organisational knowledge.
Its sharpest edge is Secureframe Defense, a dedicated federal lane that carries contractors through CMMC certification with AI-generated System Security Plans. A quote-based enterprise purchase, it serves more than 6,000 customers by its own count.
- Best for
- Continuous compliance monitoring across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS and CMMC 2.0
- CMMC certification for defence contractors through Secureframe Defense
- AI-drafted policies, risk assessments and questionnaire answers for human review
- Infrastructure-as-code remediation for failing controls
- Evidence validation that flags gaps before auditors do
- Cost
- Enterprise
- Ease
- Openness
- Hosted service
- Data
- Secureframe connects to a company's most sensitive systems, cloud infrastructure, identity and HR among them. It holds the evidence trail a compliance programme depends on, so treat it as a core data processor. Scrutinise the platform's own data terms, security documentation and published trust posture before connecting core systems, the same scrutiny it helps you apply to your own vendors. Two duties never transfer. Certifications such as SOC 2 and ISO 27001, and CMMC assessments, still require an independent human auditor or certified assessor, and AI-drafted policies, questionnaire answers and auto-generated remediation code need review by someone accountable enough to stand behind them before they reach auditors, regulators or customers. The MCP server offers read-only access to compliance data and is in public beta.
Pricing
- Vanta
Custom·Custom·Custom·Custom
Prices as of August 2026.
- Essentials
- Price on applicationno list price published
- Plus
- Price on applicationno list price published
- Professional
- Price on applicationno list price published
- Enterprise
- Price on applicationno list price published
- Secureframe
Custom·Custom·Custom
Prices as of August 2026.
- Fundamentals
- Price on applicationno list price published
- Complete
- Price on applicationno list price published
- Defense
- Price on applicationno list price published
By area
Where each one pulls ahead, area by area.
| Area | Vanta | Secureframe |
|---|---|---|
| By job | ||
| Legal & compliance | Vanta assists while a qualified human owns the outcome: risk acceptance and attestations stay human, and an independent auditor still stands between the platform and a certificate | Secureframe answers the category heavyweight with the named Comply AI suite, pre-audit evidence validation and the only dedicated CMMC federal product on the shortlist |
| Operations | Vanta runs access reviews and personnel controls against live data from hundreds of integrations rather than a spreadsheet somebody maintains by hand, and monitors controls across entities and geographies from one view | Secureframe is for the team where audit season keeps landing as an emergency and evidence requests pull engineers off real work, with its generated infrastructure-as-code fixes going through normal code review before deploy |
| By task | ||
| Automation & agents | Vanta's agent maps fragmented risk data into one live view through the Risk Graph, and its output is not self-certifying: a human reviews drafted policies and questionnaire answers before they leave the building | Secureframe replaces the evidence collection teams otherwise hand-wire from scripts, and connects deeply enough to core systems that its own data terms deserve scrutiny before the connectors go live |
Common questions
We sell to the US government. Does that decide it?
It moves Secureframe to the front of the queue. Secureframe Defense is a dedicated federal lane built to carry contractors through CMMC 2.0 certification, with AI-generated System Security Plans doing the heaviest documentation lift. Vanta's span includes FedRAMP, so it is not absent from federal ground, but a purpose-built CMMC pathway is a different level of fit for defence-adjacent sellers than framework coverage alone.
How do their AI capabilities compare?
Both automate the compliance grind with AI, branded differently. Vanta's Agentic Trust Platform sets agents on policy drafting, security questionnaires, evidence collection and issue flagging, on top of continuous control monitoring. Secureframe's Comply AI drafts policies, scores risk, maps controls across frameworks and generates infrastructure-as-code fixes for failing controls, while AI Evidence Validation catches missing documents before auditors do. The capabilities rhyme; the differentiation lives in scale and the federal lane.
Which suits a smaller company preparing for its first SOC 2?
Both serve that buyer, and both make you talk to sales to find out what it costs: neither publishes pricing nor offers a self-serve tier. Vanta's 16,000+ customer base means more peers, auditors and integrations have travelled the road before you; Secureframe's 6,000+ customers include the federal-adjacent cohort nobody else serves as directly. Get both quotes; for a first SOC 2 the platforms are closer than their marketing suggests.
Related comparisons
Read the full guides
Where to start
Not sure what to adopt first?
Five quick questions about your job, task and constraints. We'll suggest your top three tools, plus the one to try first.
Tool facts last checked August 2026